Guardians of the Galaxy

Just finished watching Guardians of the Galaxy in 3D. Overall, a great ride, with the DNA of space epics past, and held together with irreverence. The cast is wonderful, spare a few duds (I’m looking at you, Bautista), and I’m excited to see the next installment. The light-hearted attitude was perfect. With unknown characters and an intimidatingly expansive world, it never got bogged down with detail. At the same time though, I kept getting told the stakes were higher than they felt. If you have to reiterate that the bad guy is going to do a bad thing, you should’ve done a better job telling us the first time. Overall, I count this as a win, and recommend it to folks.

We open on a young boy–hello, protagonist–and immediately grow emotionally attached as we watch his mom die. Do I smell a hero? Sounds like the beginning of Star Trek: Into Darkness. On her deathbed, she gives him a present that gets tucked into his knapsack and she talks of his father, who was supposedly made of light, but that’s just babbling, right? Her final action is trying to grasp her son’s hand, but when he shies away, she dies. Looks like he’s got a good helping of motherly guilt for the rest of his life. As he’s runs outside the hospital, distraught, an alien aircraft arrives and abducts him. Surprise!

Cue the standard comic book page-flipping Marvel opening. Now we encounter the adult Peter Quill, AKA Star Lord, in a scene reminiscent of Raiders of the Lost Ark, but with a fun soundtrack pouring from Quill’s walkman cassette player. He’s listening to a mix titled Volume 1. Is there a volume 2 somewhere? Unlike the academic Mr. Jones, our Star Lord is a common thief, and prepared to sell this weird orb for a pretty penny and betray his former partner, Yondu, who places a bounty on his head.

Meanwhile, in a vague location somewhere in the galaxy, the villain stomps onscreen. Basically a life-size Smurf with black paint to compensate for facial hair, Ronan the Kree is hell-bent on destroying Xandar because they did something to his people before some peace treaty, but this movie isn’t about politics so just know that he wants to kill all the white people. Having made a deal with some other big bad, Thanos, Ronan tasks Gamora with retrieving the stolen orb from Star Lord.

Star Lord ends up on Xandar (which could’ve just been called Xearth) to sell the orb. Following an unsuccessful sale, Gamora tries to steal it, and two bounty hunters, Rocket the raccoon and Groot the living tree, try to capture him for the money. Instead, their large fight in a public place lands them all in space jail. And when we learn that Gamora intended to betray Ronan, we know the team’s all together, so the story will begin its uphill climb. At least that’s what every piece of news and advertising told me. Once in prison though, we discover Drax, a burly man with black skin and red tattoos who has it out for Ronan. Seriously the worst character ever, although that’s likely due to the stultifying way wrestler David Bautista delivers every single one of his lines, I had no clue he belonged with the team and just kept waiting for him to die. That moment never came.

Instead, these five break out of prison to sell the object to another buyer, the Collector. Here we get a one-minute cameo from Benicio Del Toro, before he cracks open the orb to reveal some nonsense that contains energy from right after the big bang or whatever. As always, when it comes to primordial space energy, handle with care. Del Toro’s lady slave decides to say fuck it and grabs the primordial space energy, basically committing suicide. But as the slave of a private space zoo owner, who can blame her?

Frustrated after a fight with the team, a grumpy Drax calls up Ronan’s entire fleet because people aren’t rational when they’ve been drinking and trying to avenge the deaths of their families, but Ronan’s team sweeps in and collects the orb, while Star Lord and Gamora are forced to board Yondu’s ship to avoid freeze to death in space. After Rocket, Groot and Drax rejoin the party, they join forces with Yondu’s team to defeat Ronan and prevent his destruction of Xandar.

Ronan, now equipped with the magic cosmic energy doodad, is ready to lay some waste. But before he can try, the Guardians swoop in with a plan. The whole fight takes place above Xandar, more specifically above what appears to be the only major city on the planet. At least from our perspective. As the fight breaks out, the Head of Xandar, or whatever Glen Close’s character’s job was, orders evacuation of the city. Seems a little late in the game for that, but no judgment. Gotta get those good pedestrian fleeing sequences in.

After the long sky battle, the enemy’s ship comes crashing down with the heroes and Ronan inside. On the ground, the crash site is quickly surrounded my civilians from the city, because apparently no one actually listened to the evacuation orders. Before Ronan can start killing, the team rend the cosmic magic rock from his possession. Star Lord, grabbing hold of the rock bare-handed, starts to glow purple, but doesn’t die like the girl from before. Could it be he’s not entirely human? Who’d have guessed? Gamora reaches out for Star Lord’s hand, just like his mom did. Joining hands with his team members to control the rock’s power, he uses it to destroy Ronan, and save the world.

Afterward, the Xandarians congratulate him and confirm that Star Lord is only half-human, but cannot identify the other half, because that’s relevant to what just happened. Sounds like a plot for…another movie. The Xandarians provide Star Lord with a repaired ship and the team sets off on an aimless adventure, likely to the set of Guardians of the Galaxy 2: Daddy Issues. As the set off, Star Lord unwraps his mom’s present going completely full circle (as every good hero’s journey should). Any guesses on the contents? That’s right! a mixtape. Volume 2 to be precise.

Like I said, a good ride, but with a few holes here and there. If you’re interested in inconsequential fun, totally head to this movie. There aren’t many heavy emotions, although there are plenty of heavy story beats, but Zoe Saldana and Chris Pratt, with the voices of Vin Diesel and Bradley Cooper, keep it alive and kicking until the very end.

Masters of Sex

Masters of Sex (first episode is available on Youtube) is a new hour-long drama about William Masters and Virginia Johnson, sexual researchers in the nineteen-fifties. Starring Michael Sheen and the fabulous Lizzy Caplan, and airing on Showtime, this show has the potential to broach the subject of sex with the style of Mad Men and the explicitness of Talk Sex with Sue Johanson.

The pilot opens at a dinner honoring Masters for his work as a fertility doctor, everyone in fancy attire. But not to worry, within three minutes we’re in a seedy motel room where a prostitute is servicing a john, while Masters observes from the closet, using his clipboard to take notes, and a stopwatch. During his debrief with the prostitute, he learns the baffling fact that she fakes her orgasms, often. She thinks he’ll need to recruit a female research partner if he hopes to gain any insight into the truths of sex. And thus the premise of the show is born.

Masters is a cold scientist with an undeniable God complex, and more arrogance than any other TV doctor, or at least on par. His clinical approach to the subject of sex is so anesthetized he cannot seem to understand the emotional or psychological implications of sex, only interested in the physical changes the human body undergoes while experiencing sexual stimulation. His viewpoint as a scientist leaves him woefully ignorant of the true nature of his study, asking the bland questions while being supplied with fascinating answers. Virginia, a lounge singer turned secretary, and a single mother, serves as an essential counterpoint to his detached attitude. Not possessing the scientific background of Masters, but studying at the college attached to the hospital, she brings a more grounded, humane touch to his work, treating his patients as people, while also developing a wonderful rapport with his wife.

After a quick introduction to Dr. Haas, a co-worker, we follow Masters home to meet Libby, his wife, and catch a glimpse of this bizarre relationship, with his nickname of ‘daddy’ and the most depressing act of sexual congress in the entire episode. With the clinical coldness of a laboratory experiment, Masters joins his wife on her single bed, situated next to his single bed separated by a night table, and, laying back to front, proceeds to have sex at her, which is the only way I can think of describing it. One of those moments where a single tear rolls down an actress’s face.

In contrast, Virginia, more open than her associate and coming from two failed marriages, arrives home from her date with Dr. Haas explaining that she looks forward to their friendship. Although friendship doesn’t exclude kissing, oral sex, or actual intercourse, just love. And while this stance may be progressive, her friend certainly has difficulty understanding the concept. Over the course of the episode, Haas’ increasing attachment leads to physical violence when Virginia refuses his emotional advances. And while he slaps her across the face for her perceived insolence, when she socks him back in the nose, a righteous wave of vindication washes over the viewer.

The rest of the episode develops the premise, a pilot requirement, but never feels overly explanatory. Masters and Johnson recruit men and women to participate anonymously in a study of sex, while also working to have the project approved by the hospital. Here we find the best one-liner of the episode when Virginia reassures a female test subject undergoing stimulation while the University Provost observes. “He’s not watching you, he’s watching science.”

The frank treatment of the subject is refreshing. Of course, I don’t know the specifics of sexual politics in the nineteen-fifties, having missed the gender studies courses in college, but I think the complexity with which these characters approach sex offers a depth of exploration. The strict social constructs surrounding sex in this period beg for a lengthy examination, and have the potential to highlight the liberation women of this time can grasp, a platform for past and current feminism. Virginia’s progressive stance on sexuality is a fascinating inversion of the usual male female sexual dichotomy, placing her in this feminist camp, no matter how fervently women avoid that word today. While she attempts to separate sex and love, the man she’s enjoying sees them as inseparable, much the opposite of today’s thinking. Women aren’t perceived as the ones seeking friends with benefits, while young men view the concept as the holy grail or a unicorn. We have women unfulfilled, delusional men, and a subject no one feels comfortable discussing. Perfect television fodder.  Since the story is based on historical events, I’m curious how accurate a telling we’ll receive, but with such great acting, I think I’ll give this show a handful of episodes before running to the possible spoilers of actual history.

The likeness of this pilot to previous American period dramas is immediately apparent. I suppose to TV producers, the fifties and sixties in America are as rich with content as the Victorian era across the pond. After the success of Mad Men, networks tried to capitalize on the same style of show, i.e. The Playboy Club and Pan Am, with terrible results. Granted, those shows failed more because their attempt was to embrace the style of the period, rather than character driven stories surrounded by a beautifully detailed world. Luckily, the creators of Masters of Sex don’t seem as interested in relishing the period as these other shows, simply embracing the environment in which the story is set. The focus revolves more around concepts of sex and the emotional mindset of America at that time, rather than well-tailored suits and furniture your grandparents owned.

Montreal Drag Show

My sister and I just returned from a trip to Montreal. It is a wonderful city, and we had a great time. Like I said on twitter, “The People, the Places, the Things… I love all of the nouns in Montreal. Even the ones I can’t read.” The official language of Montreal is French, but most of the people we encountered were bilingual, making for much easier communication. I greeted in French whenever possible because it felt proper, but always tried to throw in a warning “Hi” if I knew there would be a more extended exchange. And overall, the people were lovely. In Montreal, French speakers looked on us with pity, unlike my visit to Paris, where the feeling much more closely resembled disdain.

Thanks to the language gap though, we were in for a treat on Thursday evening. Having arrived earlier that afternoon, my sister and I decided to wander down to the Gay Village,  the area of town where Montreal Pride was taking place. You see, when we chose the dates of our trip, we had no clue that Montreal Pride was happening, but since we were there, no question we were checking it out. As luck would have it, that night’s presentation was a drag show featuring twenty Montreal Queens. Done. Nowhere else I’d rather be. We arrived at the park a little early to ensure a good view, and as the DJ, a queen decked out in varying shades of neon, prepped the crowd with fun gay tunes from ABBA, the Spice Girls and so forth, we waited for eight o’clock, when the show began.

It was entirely in French. The majority of the songs were in English, with many familiar campy and sexy tunes, but Dream, the evening’s emcee, just spoke French. This may seem impenetrable to non-French speakers, myself included, but it really only added to the whimsy and gaiety of the entertainment. If anyone needs advice on how to Camp up a drag show, put French in their mouths. Automatic perfection.  Dream was a hilarious, campy queen ready with any sharp quip needed. Or at least that’s what it sounded like. I had to take many of my laughing cues from the crowd at first, but the emcee was such a great performer that before long I found myself guffawing at her physical comedy and top-notch timing, even without understanding a word.

Now, a drag show generally consists of two types of queen: the campy, and the sexy. Since the show had no shortage of either, it provided tons of entertainment and plenty of memories. I’ll just run through a few of the best and worst to give you a taste.

The first camp bit was a little disappointing, a medley of Hairspray songs. The queen attempting to play the musical’s lead, Tracy, didn’t fit the bill at all. A major part of the musical is that Tracy is a big girl, and this queen was nowhere near the right size. But I guess someone told her that loose-fitting clothing would disguise that fact, although it didn’t disguise her lack of skill. Once I realized her medley consisted of songs from the movie starring John Travolta, rather than the musical recording, I rolled my eyes, wrote her off and waited for the next girl.

The two camp performances that really shined were “Thelma & Louise,” and “The Little Mermaid.” Thelma & Louise had the front of a car (made of cardboard) brought on stage and got ready for the end-all of road trips, with Louise dressed perfectly in her mom jeans and a scarf. Their medley of three empowering female songs fit perfectly into the narrative they acted out on stage, killing Thelma’s man and fleeing the law, all the way though driving off the cliff together. It was probably my favorite one of the night.

My sisters favorite turned out to be the Little Mermaid, probably since she adored that character during childhood. While the queen sang about wanting “to be where the people are,” she had a slight costume issue and struggled to hold up her fins, but that was overshadowed by the glitter shot into the air from behind her, emulating the famous movie scene of her singing perched on a rock as waves crash behind her. And of course, no tribute to the Disney movie is complete without the appearance of the drag queen of villains, Ursula. The medley ended in a weird place, with Ursula stealing Ariel’s voice, but after some thought I realized there isn’t a particular song that resolves the story in the movie. Plus, the final moment felt like vindication for the drag queen, re-appropriating the power of the young female voice for herself to mock and deride the world she challenges with her defiance of normalcy. Or I’m just reading too much into it.

The sexy queens were a mixed bag, with Beyonce and Nicki Minaj songs lip-synced by white girls, and one or two that would have fit better in an Adam Lambert look-alike competition. Many times, the girls seemed more interested in being pretty than selling the song; shaking their hips and tearing off clothing were their main skills. This is one of my issues with the sexy type of drag queen, but I won’t delve too deeply into my personal feelings on drag. At the end, Dream even threw on a skin-tight outfit and had a sexy song. She was the best of the queens, hosting the entire event, performing a racy pop hit, and tackling the finale as a solo. The finale was wonderful, a beautiful French ballad that Dream sold completely with her superbly expressive acting and sultry movement. As the other drag queens filled the stage armed with spray bottles, they slowly began to soak her until she was dripping wet and the stage resembled a giant puddle. This marathon performance was impressive inside and out, and I didn’t even mention the handful of backup dancers that populated many song backgrounds and must have been more exhausted than anyone else involved.

An epic success, and the perfect beginning to a weekend in Montreal, we certainly knew how to take the first step into a new city. In heels.

 

The God of Small Things

The God of Small Things is the first novel by Arundhati Roy. Published in 1997 and winner of the Booker Prize, this beautiful book is a melancholy, endearing portrait of a shattered family, and the slow recounting of their destruction. A wonderful, painful read, the haunting tragedy hanging over the story sets the tone as Roy’s abundant language fills the landscape, providing the reader with both a sweeping view of India, and a detailed illustration of this family.

The story centers around the twins Rahel & Estha, and the death of their cousin, Sophie Mol. A sweet girl, but never a full character, “…far more quickly than ever should have happened, Sophie Mol became a Memory, while The Loss of Sophie Mol grew robust and alive.” The opening scene is of the adult Rahel walking through her hometown. Here where disaster struck, where her soul was rent in two, where her life fell apart. Where she was separated from Estha, who was sent away directly after tragedy, a separation from which neither has recovered. We then move shift back to their birth, and then the funeral they all must attend. The novel’s flits between past and present allow great flexibility, building the environment of both times so the reader understands the state of these characters, both then and now.

Told in a series of snapshots that capture the personal quirks and flaws of her cast, Roy’s use of a non-linear narrative better entrenches the reader in the heart of her world, riven with tragedy. From the beginning, she shares the pasts of characters, even the ancillary, not to further the action, but to induce a mindset of loss as a fact of life, something expected, unavoidable. And while this tactic is easily perceived by the reader, Roy’s skill resides in the creation of rules unspoken, but ever-present.

Often left unmentioned, the “love laws,” as Roy terms them, are such rules. In India, the love laws pervaded society. These laws determined “who should be loved, and how. And how much.” In a broad, cultural sense, these can be interpreted through the caste system, which determined the social class of an individual. In The God of Small Things, Roy takes the concept and runs with it. Much of the book can be seen as a riff on these laws, even if hardly mentioned in the text. To Roy, the love laws seem to be an aspect of India’s essence, and in this book they appear in much the same way. So ingrained are these laws that for the adult characters, no mention is needed. Yet the children are left in the dark. The adults act as if these love laws are inherent, ignoring the fact that their discrimination is learned, not primal.  It is only as the reader moves through the book that this social construct is perceived, a construct so necessary the narrative would crumble without it. The magic of this work exists in Roy’s ability to lay this truth bare without subverting the small, essential joys sprinkled in the pages.

The ability to find joy and survive tragedy is in the realm of the Small God. A mercurial being, the God stands at the edge of the page, but his presence is always felt. Roy’s first explanation lies behind Rahel’s adult eyes, wrongly perceived as “between difference and despair.” In India, the Small God offers respite through both tragedy and joy. In comparison to the epic turmoil surrounding the country, personal despair is inconsequential. The Small God is happiness in the face of small tragedy, and small joy. “In the country that [Rahel] came from, poised forever between the terror of war and the horror of peace, Worse Things kept happening. So the Small God laughed a hollow laugh, and skipped away cheerfully…the source of his brittle elation was the relative smallness of his misfortune.”

After finishing the last word, I had the strong urge to return to page one, reliving the story in a more informed fashion, but since I read those last words on the way to my book club meeting, I haven’t yet gotten the chance. As per usual, I picked up the book three days before the meeting, a time when the countdown is measured better in hours than in days. But the last few books hadn’t been this literary. Or I’d listened to the audio book. But this one won an award, is considered literature; the back cover compares her to Faulkner. I felt the sinking obligation. Initially skeptical that I’d finish in time, and with a considerable lack of knowledge about India, I started reading. As the narrative voice took hold, I was captivated. Whisked away to a beautiful India. In retrospect, I think the short length of my reading period was an advantage. Every event was fresh in my mind, no reminders were needed. I could recall the tricks of Roy’s language with ease, and her vast story overtook me like a wave, all at once. It is sad. It is beautiful. It is a Kathakali troupe, full of magic and the Great Stories, dancing “to ask pardon of the gods.”

Please Like Me, Episode 1: Rhubarb & Custard

Please Like Me is a new program from Australia, written by and starring young comedian Josh Thomas. Following the life of a young man named Josh, the audience joins him as his life begins a major shift. This hilarious comedy spoke to the frightened adult inside of me as responsibility and reality continue to hit Josh head-on in the opening episode. While I don’t yet know its trajectory, I have a feeling this series will speak more clearly to my generation than many previous attempts, but maybe I’m not being enough of a cynic.

Josh is a young man about to turn twenty and living with his best friend, Tom. In one twenty-four-hour span his girlfriend breaks up with him, he spends his first night with a man, and his mother attempts suicide. Quite a few major moments in Josh’s life rush in all at once, and, while this course of events is terrifying, we’re treated to the comedic underpinnings of these serious situations thanks to a skilled writer and performer.

The opening scene contains the uncomfortable break-up, but Claire, Josh’s girlfriend, handles the situation beautifully. Claire forces them both to grow up. From their conversation, it’s apparent they’ve known each other since puberty, so part of Josh’s attachment to their relationship is comfort. Instead of confronting honest feelings, he likely finds it easier to ignore his homosexuality. Claire desires happiness for both of them, so she makes Josh to face this issue. Although protesting at first, Josh’s tacit acceptance that starts him on the path to adulthood, where he can find real happiness.

We immediately jump to an upbeat opening title sequence, watching Josh select groceries from densely packed shelves while we jam to I’ll Be Fine by Clairy Browne & the Bangin’ Rackettes. It is tough to sit still while this great song plays; at least one head bop is obligatory. If you haven’t been hooked by the show yet, this will likely do the trick.

Josh travels to Tom’s office, where we meet Josh’s love interest. Geoffrey’s introduction sets a complex relationship between the two. While he cries at his desk over his father’s recent arrest, Josh, uncomfortable with emotion, awkwardly tries to offer respite with pop rocks swiped from Tom’s desk. Somehow, Geoffrey invites himself over for dinner and eventually they fall into bed together. Or more, Geoffrey falls into bed, in just his briefs, while Josh dons full pajamas and apprehensively crawls in as well. His naivety is endearing, trying to retain his modesty while a scantily clad man lays in his bed, but also addresses the honest feeling many young people have with approaching sex for the first time. Geoffrey is straightforward and open, a welcome foil to Josh’s cluelessness about romantic male relations and emotions.

Unfortunately, the morning does not continue the upswing in positivity. His mother’s suicide attempt is revealed in a set of voicemails in reverse chronological order which skillfully building dramatic tension until we hear Josh’s mother at the other end of the phone, pleading for his help. It is heartbreaking. Josh and Tom hop in the car, where their discussion dances around the night before, and the situation they’re headed toward, but Josh’s difficulty with facing emotion is clear all the way to the hospital. Even in the sad light of his mother’s attempted suicide though, these two can still have a laugh, unable to stifle a smile at the thought of his mother, who chased painkillers with half a bottle of Baileys.

When Josh gets to the hospital, his dad (divorced from Josh’s mom) is waiting, along with Claire. The short exchange between Claire and Josh is reassuring because they joke and laugh like friends; there is no animosity between them. Josh goes back to see his mother alone, and after discussing the situation with the doctor, the only two options are to place his mother in a home, or move back in with her. While Josh mulls the decision over, his father drives him home.

Walking to his porch alone, Josh slumps into the couch they keep there, and gently sobs. He doesn’t linger long before wiping his eyes and walking inside, but this single moment alone reveals his personal turmoil and the difficulty of these new, adult responsibilities. But Geoffrey is inside, never having left, bringing a smile to Josh’s face as we learn he cooked the roommates dinner, but places a peck on Josh’s cheek as he leaves them to enjoy it alone.

After watching the first episode, I was immediately hooked. Like children are on phonics. The main character has so many traits with which I identify, it felt directly tailored to my tastes. Josh Thomas is a funny, witty artist and if this first episode is a glimpse of the skill behind this television show, we’re in for an impressive series. The script moves quickly, but has plenty of neurotic rambling from Josh, including the aging of his face, why Tom loves giraffes, and if the big and small denomination is incorrect when referring to spooning. The camerawork is fabulous, framing shots in a way that drive the story, and adds dimension to the emotions experienced on screen. Plus, the upbeat soundtrack and funky, pastel Australia setting only strengthen the world Thomas has created.

Overall, this opening episode is top notch, and I hope the future episodes continue on this stellar track. I urge you to watch it. The first episode is available on Youtube, and if you’re not getting (or can’t get) Pivot, the new channel where it is airing, you can purchase the six episodes of season one on iTunes, which I will be doing.

Identity Thief

Identity Thief came out this weekend and being one of the first formulaic comedy movies of the year to pique my interest, I caught a showing. This movie stars Jason Bateman of Arrested Development fame, and Melissa McCarthy, known to most as the actress from Bridesmaids. As the movie opens, McCarthy steals Bateman’s identity, and what follows are the comedic escapades of a buddy-comedy style cross-country journey to justice.  While Bateman and McCarthy play off of each other brilliantly, the movie seems more focused on providing a stage for their repartee than telling a quality story, a disservice to the film’s potential and the cast.

It’s apparent the plot is secondary to the performers early on because the writer clearly made little effort in even building a believable opening. Sandy Bigelow Patterson (Bateman) is a corporate financial accountant who doesn’t have enough sense to withhold his social security number from an obvious phishing ruse perpetrated by “Diana” (McCarthy). Diana proceeds to have an outrageous spending spree in Florida as Sandy goes on with his life in Colorado, until the police get involved. Sandy is met with useless Colorado law enforcement who won’t aid in the arrest of Diana because she’s across the country, but have no qualms when Sandy embarks on a kidnapping (kidnapping almost surely being a crime). Finally, Sandy flies to Florida, and he and Diana are thrust together as two members of the local drug cartel (assumption) start trying to kill Diana for selling them bad fake credit cards. And somewhere along the way, a bounty hunter joins the chase too. What follows is absurd and cheesy, gives no depth or detail, and marches out too many ancillary characters to care about or remember, including Sandy’s wife and kids.

There weren’t too many scenes that elicited a hearty laugh, but I absolutely loved Bateman and McCarthy’s on-screen chemistry. Bateman is a perfect straight man for McCarthy, as he lets her run wild with the jokes before reining it in with a biting commentary. And honestly, I’d just love for him to throw on a slim-fitting suit more often. McCarthy definitely hits the mark in this performance,  bringing complexity and realism to an otherwise lackluster film, and demonstrating she desperately needs a quality comedy to sink her teeth into. She is slightly garish at times when hamming up the lowly comic jokes she’s given, but still deftly employs her acting skills to reveal her character’s deep loneliness and desire for human connection. Through her, the audience can access the few honest and serious moments available. Within the strong-willed exterior, Diana is a troubled woman with no family or friends of any sort. She tries to fake friendship through money, but instead deepens the sorrow she feels, and it isn’t until Sandy comes along that she believes anyone could even notice her, let alone value her. McCarthy gives such a genuine performance, the scenes where she tackles serious content never feel forced or false, and it’s apparent why this woman’s past credits include an Oscar nomination.

In spite of the quality performances, the movie is still chock full of schlock. The majority of the jokes stem from physical comedy and stereotyping, certainly not where the comic skills of the actors lie. There are countless moments of McCarthy getting knocked around in a haphazard manner, and terrible jokes about different pockets of American culture. Sandy and Diana, after passing into Georgia (welcome sign reading: “Welcome to Georgia: Home of Adventure”), arrive at a diner so lurid, I’m suspicious the screenwriter has never been through the southern United States before and just used his vague recollections of that one time he watched My Cousin Vinny, although nothing much (or at all) can be expected of the screenwriter that penned such gems as Scary Movie 3, Scary Movie 4, and The Hangover: Part 2.  The movie tilted between broad and bizarre in the comedy department, and never embraced either. The most unsettling scene of the entire film, a moment that stunned the audience into silence and made me question the credentials of the filmmakers, was the snake attack. They find themselves battling a cheaply CGIed snake, with a stick wielding McCarthy attacking said snake as it tightly wraps around Bateman’s neck and sinks its teeth into him. This scene, more fear than farce , was completely out of pace with the rest of the film and belonged much more in a survival narrative than a comic one. In the bizarre vein, near the end of the film Diana meets Trish, Sandy’s wife, and delivers one of the most unusual and confusing speeches I’ve ever heard. Instead of offering any sort of apology, it is a monologue assuring Trish nothing untoward happened between Sandy and Diana on the open road. It is utterly unintelligible. Disappointingly, neither of these scenes fit the tone or style of this movie’s comedy, and only help to illustrate the larger issue of this heavily disjointed story.

A bumpy ride with more “bathroom break” moments than riveting ones, this movie will join the mediocre pantheon and probably find its edited way to TBS, but for now I’d just look past it to the other projects these actors have headed their way. Jason Bateman will reprise his role as Michael Bluth in a new season of Arrested Development, and Melissa McCarthy is co-directing and producing, with her husband, a film she co-wrote, with her husband, and starring in it alongside Shirley MacClaine, both promising endeavors. If you are a serious Bateman or McCarthy fan I recommend you grab a seat, but otherwise, don’t worry about it.

Mr. Penumbra’s 24-Hour Bookstore: January Book Club

Mr. Penumbra’s 24-Hour Bookstore, by Robin Sloan, is this month’s selection for my book club. It follows the story of Clay Jannon, a recent art school graduate, who happens upon a job as the third-shift clerk for a peculiar bookstore run by a peculiar old man. He is as of yet unaware of the adventure awaiting him in the secret books and curious customers walking into his life. While wearing the appearance of a quirky modern novel focused on the confrontation of literature and technology, it read more like a classroom exercise in novel composition, and seemed less interested in the artistry involved in writing. I’d be lying if I said there weren’t fun moments, but it was extremely predictable at every turn, and I wish it hadn’t been.

Seeming more interested in pushing toward conclusion than exploring his creation, Sloan chooses a plot and then sketches a world around its edges, giving his creation no room to thrive. The reader is sees a set of predictable, well-worn characters with no substance, stirring an emotion closer to loathing than anything else as the story unfolds. We have the awkward main character who is a nerd because he used to read a fantasy novel, The Dragonsong Chronicles, and play Dungeons & Dragons, wait I mean Rockets and Warlocks (a terrible fake title; you shouldn’t mix fantasy and science) as a child. There’s the love interest, herself a nerd and computer whiz who works at Google, and has a surprising amount of clout with her employer for her young age. There’s the sidekick best friend from childhood (specific friendship centered upon love of aforementioned fantasy novel and RPG) who is just as nerdy, but also a Silicon Valley tycoon thanks to his computer software that renders breasts in 3D for video games. Then we have Mr. Penumbra, the eccentric old man that the young folk must save. All the other characters are ancillary, and most could probably be discarded without damaging the plot. Of the main four, none really even stood out and the entire book felt so generic. I think Sloan is unable to harness the voice of the generation he depicts, and it seems to me the work of an author pandering to a disengaged audience, much like a father attempts to impress his children. He spends more time mentioning iPhone games, e-readers, Google and than any quality character development, and the few characters who develop more than a sentence-long background are still just a hodgepodge of quirks, nothing more.

By mixing flimsy character elements with rapid narrative speed, we’re left with a lack of suspense and an overflow of action. Somehow days or weeks elapse over the course of a few pages, so the reader has no concept of time in this world. There are myriad plot points hit in unrelenting succession, but don’t think that signals adventure. Although not likely the intent, this book undercuts tension  at every turn. Any exciting incident is immediately resolved so the narrative can move forward; there’s no time to understand the effect these situations have on the characters. I was baffled why any character was emotionally invested in any other because no reasons were given for such investment and the amount of emotional depth in all the relationships, even the romantic one, equates to that of cordial acquaintances at a party. Even if the author consciously forsook character for plot, he apparently figured focusing on plot meant writing a lot of it.  More often than not, the tension is destroyed by the undermining of consequence. The narrator finds himself in bad situations, but always gets by, not by any personal means, but simply through the indifference of the other characters. No one seems to worry when centuries-old secrets are revealed, instead using those moments to supply back story. No stakes are clearly established so the story always feels vague, as even the characters themselves don’t seem to understand their motivations.

This novel didn’t explore greater conflict of literature versus technology any further than the difficulty of scanning books and harvesting their information. A detailed rumination on the subject would be welcomed, as this fight gets at the core of new versus old, but instead we have a book that would rather let us know friendship is important, because that’s news… I guess I just left disappointed with the book it could have been. The writing style, while not terrible, is nothing to write home about, and I think he should have styled his novel like he described in the epilogue. “I will write down everything that happened. I’ll copy some of it from the logbook, find more in old emails and text messages, and reconstitute the rest from memory.” In this format, Sloan’s story could have been told with a collection of all the different writing styles available in books and online, letting the reader piece the novel together and solve the puzzle himself. Sadly, we’re not left with anything as exciting, and close the final pages unsatisfied.

To those who liked the book, my apologies. To my book club cohorts, I hope this doesn’t sour your opinion of me or my reviews, and I’ll try to like things more in the future. I think I just let my inner cynic invade this entire review. While not an amazing work of literature, it’s a short, easy quest that fits in a weekend, and can be quite fun. Don’t worry though, you’ll take home a number of life lessons at the end; they’re all summarized in the epilogue.

Zero Dark Thirty

Zero Dark Thirty is the story of hunting and killing Osama bin Laden. The centerpiece of this story is Maya, an agent recruited by the CIA directly after high school, and her focus on the destruction of bin Laden, with the audience following her journey from the repercussions of 9/11 to bin Laden’s death. This film portrayed a captivating story, posed serious questions to the audience, and contained a stunning performance by Jessica Chastain as Maya. Even if I did perceive a few hollow moments, I highly recommend it to all.

The opening sequence, a collage of 911 calls from 9/11, is a bleak start to a harrowing movie. While frightening, I believe this device is deployed exquisitely as it manipulates the audience to accept jingoism in regard to torture during the following scenes. This torture does not last long, and we’re taken away toward other parts of the story rather early, but I think Kathryn Bigelow’s depiction of is especially complex, and I wouldn’t have been averse to a longer meditation on the subject.  Unlike the thriller genre which often contains tense and exciting interrogations, these interrogations were terror laced with psychopathy, and I was drawn to sympathize with the detainee, regardless of his crimes or knowledge. Chastain nails the internal struggle of the subject matter with her body language in the opening scenes, but she deftly manages to don cold indifference, a mask she must wear throughout the film.

As we move away from torture, the pace picks up so quickly that we’re more given snapshots of moments than a cohesive story. When Maya first meets her colleagues in Pakistan, the audience is thrown into an incomprehensible roundtable discussion filled with confusing military terms, names, and abbreviations. The exposition seemed non-existent, as if the director assumes every viewer enters with the cultural knowledge and understanding of 9/11. This hurts the film because the audience must start out deconstructing jargon and determining where in the post-9/11 narrative we are, instead of seeing character or relationship development. As we travel through the movie, a rotating door of characters assume the usual positions for Maya to act at. I can honestly say I do not recall a single character’s name besides Maya.

At seemingly regular intervals the film jumps forward, usually to a new act of terrorism. I think these scenes rapidly achieve predictability, as apparently everything in Bigelow’s world goes eerily silent moments before an explosion. Even if predictable, the handling of the violence was masterful, showing that Bigelow can display such acts without a sense of voyeurism or emotional exploitation, and I think the scene at the Afghanistan army base involving Maya’s single female friend was the only heavy-handed attempt at an otherwise successful portrayal of true violent events. Between the terrorist attacks and torture, I’d argue this film is less the hunt for Osama bin Laden and more a depiction of the complexity of torture and war in the Middle East.

Torture and war are ever-present topics in our culture and Bigelow excels in confronting the viewer with conflicting views on these topics. The movie’s first bout of torture produces helpful information for Maya, but at what cost. As the film progresses and the political views on torture transform over the years, we’re shown the difficulties placed on these agents as they try to gather intelligence without what they consider a most useful and necessary tool . Instead of allowing the audience to leave the theater with a completely vindicated opinion on the horrors of torture, Bigelow forces viewers to consider opposing perspectives they’d perhaps not previously considered. The most memorable of these moments is the strike of Seal Team 6. As we watch these men descend on the house, we’re aware of not only the terrorists behind the walls, but also the women and children. This stark difference between how these two different groups are treated in the raid illuminates the conflict inherent to this war, that of terrorists as people, not simply targets, and those scenes full of terrified children and dead bodies resonate long after the viewer has left the theater. Through Chastain’s final scene, the audience understands this conflict has taken its toll on all involved. Sitting alone in a military aircraft preparing to fly home from Pakistan, the final line is a question posed to Maya from the pilot. “Where do you want to go?” Sadly, this is unanswerable. This woman’s sole purpose the past twelve years has been realized and now the death of this terrorist might imply the death of her purpose. The unfathomable relief is tempered with that loss, and the final moments leaves the viewer with an uncertain future for both Maya and the Middle East.

More character piece than depiction of truth, this movie is a modern myth that succeeds in stirring my American patriotism and consideration of complex moral issues surrounding torture, and I think it you should seek it out. I don’t expect it will win the Oscar, but I think it deserves a place on the nomination list, unlike others. See this movie, you won’t regret it.

Ficciones by Jorge Luis Borges

I could not put down this collection of short stories. A wonderful mixture of philosophy and fantasy, I would place this book in the hand of any friend. I hope not to weigh this review down with too much philosophical talk, even though that’s practically all this book is, because in the hands of many a person, the stories and language would surely captivate enough to not overwhelm the reader with philosophy.

I suppose I should provide a little background for this book choice. Recently, I finished Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace, a phenomenal book I’m still trying to review. Throughout 2012, as I worked through IJ, I researched the a bit on the history of modern literature, but not anything too in-depth. One short story consistently reappeared in lists of influences and innovations as I searched, The Garden of Forking Paths. After reading a few sentences about the story I was convinced I needed to read it and anything like it, so I finally ordered the book on Amazon and tore through its pages in two days. I will say I had to read every story twice, if only to grasp the philosophical weight contained in each piece, but that did not dampen my adoration or enjoyment. In these stories, Borges tackles two important ideas of the human experience, time and memory; ideas filling the minds of men and pages of books since the dawn of time. I found this collection a concise and useful portal into these philosophical worlds, and cannot wait to expand my reading list to include a much needed philosophy component.

There are two sections of this book: The Garden of Forking Paths (also the title of the last story in the first part), and Artifices; I think they’re separated in such a way because of original separate publication, but don’t quote me on that. While I usually skip the prefaces, introductions, or forwards, finding them often too full of vanity or misplaced reverence, I decided it was necessary to read them since I’m offering a review and not just reading for pleasure.  As expected, the introduction, written by translator Anthony Kerrigan, was stuffed with lofty thoughts on the genius nature of Borges and left a bad taste in my mouth. Kerrigan seems to have felt the need to justify Borges’s place in the pantheon of great philosophical literature, considering the readers too unintelligent to grasp the quality of Borges’s contributions otherwise. I found the author’s prologues much more self-effacing as he succinctly explains the intent of his stories while avoiding self-righteousness, and they primed my pump for the stories ahead.

Instead of attempting to write magnificent, enormous tomes, Borges explains his style as simply writing about these tomes, using the imaginary work as a driving force of the story. This allows him to both create numerous fascinating books without the difficulty of writing them, and to imagine works impossible in reality, but relevant to his philosophical intents. While I found a desire to read these fictional books he discusses, I also understood these masterpieces are unable to exist. The imaginary world provides limitless potential and mystery, so an ephemeral story existing only in thought possesses unfathomable beauty, while a realistic attempt at such a fantastical idea could result in nothing but failure. As Borges introduces these fictitious writings, he weaves them so deftly into the real literary world that it grows difficult to distinguish the two. It quickly becomes apparent that the only memorable line from the Introduction, “…he has read all of the books,” rings a resounding truth. Somehow, Borges has read every book, or at least the vast part of major literature from all ages past, and uses every tool gained from such knowledge to construct this book. At a certain point, the reader must give up any attempt to note all the references made; I stopped at the end of The Approach to Al-Mu’tasim, the second story. Of course the allusions never feel forced, and Borges uses them only to further the plot or philosophical questions posed, not for flashing his impressive bone fides. The most useful addition to this book would be an annotation so the reader can begin to understand the depth of thought and literary ancestry involved. Plus, I think it’d be a fun follow-up read.

The most striking stories of the collection include The Garden of Forking Paths, Funes the Memorious, Death and the Compass, and The Secret MiracleWhile I think any of his pieces have strong resonance with the audience, I believe those I just listed would be most appealing to the unfamiliar reader. Of course I recommend them all, but don’t want to put off any fickle readers with the more opaque selections. The Garden of Forking Paths and Death and the Compass are both detective stories, though while I think the latter is strictly that, I believe the former to be a deep exploration of thought masquerading as mystery, but with a shocking end. In Compass, the reader is carried along a murder mystery exquisitely rendered. Borges captures in thirteen pages what Dan Brown clumsily seeks in all of The DaVinci Code, and since I’m ever the cynic, I cannot avoid the thought that Brown simply created a blatant and bloated version of a wonderful story, and I feel retroactively cheated for having read the rip-off in the first place. Funes the Memorious is by far the most thought-provoking, dealing with the concept of human thought and the perception of reality. In Funes, the narrator recalls a meeting with a unique young man, able to remember everything, even minute details from any instance in his past, much like an autistic savant. As the conversation is revealed, Borges slowly confronts the reader with an unsettling conceptualization of reality, and, in my opinion, the strongest articulation of a philosophical concept in the book. The final of my recommendations, The Secret Miracle, deals with an author, sentenced to death, forcing him to leave his magnum opus unfinished. Being one of the only two stories in the book dealing with God, I believe Borges embraces the higher power without heralding belief or blasphemy, a refreshing change of pace. I felt Borges goal lay in convincing the reader that regardless of the content of a personal masterpiece, its value is ultimately, and perhaps intangibly tied only to the self and higher power. The illustration used was both poignant and comic, and captured the mercurial essence of God in a way that has left me thoughtful. Paired with his considerations in Three Versions of Judas, Borges provides a complex portrait of God within this book, through which I believe Borges’s reverence and respect is apparent.

If I must offer one criticism though, and I must, it is the translation. The original stories were written in Spanish the years of 1936-1953, and in 1962 the English translation was published. With a fifty year gap between the translation and current day, a certain level of anachronistic language would be expected, but as I stepped into the stories, I noticed something that felt less skillful and more frivolous in nature. I balked at unnecessary words that left the text cloudy in places, and while a likely detriment to the original, it’s not unsettling enough to avoid the read. And let’s be serious, if you’ve read this far, you’re hopefully slightly interested in this book, regardless of my final ramblings.

If allowed, I’d wax rhapsodic about this book for days, but I do not want to spoil any plots or drive anyone away. I honestly could not sing the praises of these stories enough and urge anyone slightly interested in thought to pick this collection up.

Gangster Squad

Last night I caught Gangster Squad with some friends and while it had moments of fun, overall I wouldn’t recommend paying full price for a ticket.

Gangster Squad is about a Los Angeles cop, played by Josh Brolin, recruited by the Chief of Police to form a SECRET task force, the Gangster Squad, to take down the powerful gangster Mickey Cohen, played by Sean Penn, before he takes over the city. The movie moves so quickly that Brolin recruits his crew: an old cowboy type, a nerd, a black guy, a Mexican guy and Ryan Gosling, and has the operation running within the first thirty minutes or so. They’re an odd combination, the squad, but it seems to work as they go about trying to take down different Cohen businesses in montage. The essential line using their colloquial title, the gangster squad, isn’t even an important or cinematically interesting moment, with one of them throwing out the name in a drunk toast, nothing more. Throughout the movie, the characters are constantly mentioning “the war” just so it’s obnoxiously clear to the audience that these men have “seen some things”, even if they all look fresher than a new deck of cards. This clunky plot device is only one piece of the terrible puzzle, but when all the pieces clunk, ineptitude is hard to tune out. I don’t want to blame the actors because the substance simply isn’t there for them to work with, but they all felt on auto-pilot. I suppose much is never expected from the first major movie of the year; it’ll be forgotten by March and once these actors deliver better quality work in other features, this won’t even be a blip on their resumes. With all the predictable and ordinary story developments leading to the film’s expected conclusion, I left feeling like I’d seen the most generic gangster film ever made.

The entire movie seemed to work consciously to throw as much violence on screen as possible. The opening scene shows a man torn apart by two cars and it doesn’t relent, with the completely arbitrary decisions from the filmmakers of which acts of violence warranted graphic detail. Faced with the gruesome violence ever-present in this film, my mind is drawn to a comment made on a recent episode of Pop Culture Happy Hour. Concisely, the point made was that violence seems to be moving out of the cultural zeitgeist and that we’ll see a tiring of violence in popular culture in the near future. I must agree and hope we’re headed in a more enlightened direction. I’m not trying to be a prude; I just think filmmakers use violence gratuitously and in ways that allow them to avoid serious story and character development. This entire movie felt like a quick sprint from one piece of action to another and the audience almost never had a chance to delve into any character too deeply. Poor Emma Stone was so ancillary to the plot my guess is they shot her scenes in one day. If anything, I wish we’d at least had more scenes with Brolin’s character’s wife, played by Mireille Enos, because I found her internal conflict with her husband’s work and safety, although well-worn territory, the most in-depth story available.. Trust me, that isn’t saying much.

I must say though, the most unsettling aspect of the whole affair was Sean Penn’s prosthetic face. More disconcerting than Joseph Gordon Levitt’s in Looper and Mickey Rourke’s in real life, Penn’s face seemed better suited among the cast of Dick Tracy or a nuclear waste facility. I don’t know how well I handled Sean Penn’s performance for that matter either. While a highly skilled dramatic actor, in a role like this he’s an intolerably comic character. Even as a vicious monster, he character is such a joke I can’t take his evil actions seriously on any real level and it immediately starts to slide into the world of Camp.

Best of luck on your next projects to all of those involved.